Yardsticks

Wow, what an election. Like the world series in one night. I’m happy that Bush won, and looking forward to 4 more years. If we could just get someone who wasn’t so opposed to gays and abortion, then that’d be even better, but keeping me alive and not stealing from me is a good start.

Jonah makes an interesting point over at the National Review.

I have been affected, in my day to day life, by the sort of bureaucracy that dems generally want to inflict on the world. If everyone were on Medicaid, medical billing would be hell, and we in the medical billing software industry would:

  1. Have great job security
  2. Have crappy jobs

2 Responses to “Yardsticks”

  1. On December 19th, 2004 at 01:42:28, Tracy Said:

    Comment to your medicare hatred… True, if everyone were on medicare, we’d have a shitload of problems, but the same could be said for having to live on SSI. I pity the poor old folks who are damned to living on 600 dollars a month, and to top it all off, every other month medicare won’t cover there prescriptions! :-(

  2. On December 19th, 2004 at 14:53:21, Isaac Schlueter Said:

    Just to make something clear, I’m not saying that it’d be a good idea to pull the rug out from under the people relying on SS and Medica(re|id). To do so would be defaulting on a contract - invalid as the contract might have been (since the gov’t entered into it with “play money” from the start), it wouldn’t be fair. At the same time, I’m passionately opposed to taking money from Frank to pay for Joe - stealing is never right.

    These programs can be safely phased out. Most of the people relying on socialist programs would have made other plans their entire lives if they hadn’t been told that they’d be taken care of in their old age. And, sure enough, as you so aptly point out, the promises often turn out to be empty anyhow. So, stop telling people that they’re going to be taken care of. If we cancelled Medicare/SS benefits (and Medicare/SS taxes!) for everyone born after 1990, and provide everyone born after 1975 the ability to opt out (stop paying for it, and give up their future benefits,) then we could cut the costs dramatically for a huge chunk of the workforce, and put an aweful lot of money back into the hands of the people working for it. Those people could invest in private options (mutual funds, retirement plans, 401k, etc.) which are not pyramid schemes. Those who had been paying for (and relying upon) SS for the majority of their working lives would still be able to get the benefits promised to them.

    The last thing we should do is expand the reach of these programs.

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated like crazy using a variety of plugins. There is a very high likelihood that your comment won't show up right away, especially if you have never commented here before, but it was not deleted.

Please be patient, and do not post your comment more than once. It will show up once it is approved.

You must be logged in to post a comment.